Hamlet’s Tragic Flaw         In the play Hamlet (1307-1407) by William

hamlets Tragic Flaw         In the head for the hills hamlet (1307-1407) by William Shakespeare, a materialisation prince named small townsfolk is forced to exact with whatsoever(prenominal) things: his father, pansy critical point has died and his mother, Gertrude, has quick re unite. She is directly married to King crossroadss brother Claudius. Claudius also replaces King critical point as King of Denmark. So now prince village must postulate with his fathers demolition, his mothers oerhasty marriage (2.2.57), and the fact that his uncle is the male monarch when that military position should skilfulfully be his. This is a lot for young small town to handle. He even continues to wear black months after(prenominal)ward his fathers shoemakers last. blockage learns that a phantasm looking exactly desire his keeps appearing. When settlement speaks to the nuance he learns that his father was murdered. village is immobilize when the c utaneous senses tells him the serpent that did sting thy fathers feel / now wears his crown (1.5.39-40). crossroads learns that Claudius murdered his father by gushy poison in his ear. With all of the things small town was already baffled about he now had an even bigger difficulty to face, avenging his fathers death. With this news star would hazard that critical point would find his uncle and blot out him right a counsel. But juncture does non seek out Claudius. Instead, he waits. small towns tragic flaw is the fact that he thinks before he acts. settlement is a procrastinator. small town could nurse saved many lives, including his own, if he would keep back just trusted the ghost and acted on impulse instead of thinking so much.         One of the lives settlement could birth saved is also cardinal of the lives he takes himself. The archetypical to die is Polonius, chief counselor to Claudius. Polonius dies when Hamlet stabs him throug h a wall hanging. Is it the king? (3.4.28) ! asks Hamlet. Unfortunately, it is non the king and Hamlet has killed an faultless man. The death of Polonius could do unitary over been prevented if Hamlet would non hold back questi wholenessd what the ghost told him. Hamlet was unsure of the ghosts satinpod so he do the visiting players put on a play called The writ of exe snipion of Gonzago. This led to the equity existence revealed. When Hamlet learns that the ghost told him the truth he hush does not kill Claudius. If he would harbour killed Claudius right whence and at that place thusly Polonius would neer become died. Polonius would not direct been female genitals the arras if Hamlet would ease up killed Claudius as before long as he was sure of his guilt.         Ophelias death could gain also been prevented if Hamlet would get under unitarys skin killed Claudius right away. Ophelia becomes mad after her fathers death. Whether or not she was mad be attempt her father died, o r be effort the man she loved (Hamlet) is the one who killed her father is uncertain. Ophelia just walks around the castle singing tunes that do not entertain any sense in an closely trance- kindred state. Opelia falls into the stream when the branch she is sitting on breaks. She was weave garlands and hanging them from the tree. Ophelia dies when Hamlet is away but her death is unagitated his fault. If Hamlet would present killed Claudius right away and so Polonius would not retain died, and if Polonius did not die than Ophelia never would overhear at rest(p) mad, and if Ophelia was not mad past she w haveethorn not have been up in the go forthow tree in the initiatory place, Climbing a tree is not something ladies did in that measure period, and Ophelia was taught throughout her whole life to be skirt like and obedient.         Hamlet also could have prevented the deaths of Rosencrantz and Guildentstern if he would not have procrastinated. Altho ugh Hamlet did purposely have his two friends killed,! their deaths still could have been prevented. The two men would not have been shoping on Hamlet if If Hamlet would have killed Claudius right away. Because afterall, Claudius was the one who asked them to denounce on him. Also, the trip to England never would have taken place. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern should not have been killed.         Hamlets procrastination is also the cause of the next four deaths in the play. Hamlet learns that he is challenged to a affaire dhonneur with Laertes which is to happen before the king and queen. When the affaire dhonneur begins Hamlet has a sword in his hand, and Claudius perfectly reachable, but he still does not kill him. It is a shame as well because what Hamlet does not know is that Claudius planned the duel in order to kill him. In an earlier facial expression Claudius and Laertes make plans to poison the tip of Laertess sword so that the slightest cut will kill Hamlet.

Claudius decides that if Laertes cannot cut Hamlet they will command another way, so Claudius will also put some of the poison in a drink which Hamlet will drink after he has won the duel. passim the duel the poison ends up killing four passel when it was unfeignedly only if intended for one. Gertrude is poisoned after drinking in rejoicing after Hamlet gets a second hit on Laertes. Claudius dies after Hamlet finally decides it is duration to kill him. And Laertes and Hamlet die because they were both cut with the poisonus sword during the duel. If Hamlet would have used his thinking season to think of the surmount way to kill Claudius, instead of thinking about whether or not the ghost was real, or whether or not the ghost was honest, then so many people would not hav! e died.         Hamlet killing Polonius is the start of all of the other characters deaths. Laertess death ties in with Poloniuss death. If Laertes was not so raving mad at Hamlet for killing his father then he may not have been so easily manipulated by Claudius in the plan to kill Hamlet. If Laertes was not so wroth then the duel between him and Hamlet would have never occurred. When Hamlet kills Polonius a domino effect begins with the deaths of the other characters. If Hamlet would have believed the ghost and killed Claudius right away then only one would have died.         Hamlet postulateed to wait for the right time to kill Claudius, and because of this eight people lost their lives when only one person needed to. Hamlet is a great instinct but his thinking caused him great distress and may have even made him a little crazy. But if Hamlet was the type of person that did not think before he acted then William Shakespeares play Hamlet probably would not be one of the greatest tragedies ever written. After all, if Hamlet would have killed Claudius right away, and those eight people did not lose their lives, then there probably would not be much of a story to tell. Hamlet would have became king and everyone would have lived jubilantly everafter. Like we have never heard that one before.          If you take to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay