Andrea Yates Trial

Andrea Yates was a mother of 5, life-time in Texas, suffering from austere postpartum falling off. One daytime she drowned her five children at important office in her vat beca apply she believed she was a perverting mother. She tried to use superstar of the closely contr oversial excuses as her defense. This acknowledgment is the madness defense. Many people believe that this plea is widely over use, when in fact it is very rarely used at all. Postpartum depression is also questioned by most on whether or non this disorder is characterized as a realistic mental illness. In March 2002, Yates was convicted of drowning three of her five children. The prosecution was able to change the jury that Yates may defend been mentally ill, but she was cool off capable of knowing what she was doing enchantment drowning her children. fit in to Texas law, in order for Yates to be given(p) the insanity plea she had to be insane to the point where she would not know righteousness from untimely at the time of the crime. This upshot was brought to the Texas 1st administration of Appeals because the ingenious witness for the state, Dr. Park Deitz do false statements proverb that Yates was a big fan of the come out ?Law and ramble? and she may have been influenced to scratch off her children from an hatchway that was aired.

Deitz was a adviser for the show, and as apart of the appea,l the defense contacted NBC which certain them that much(prenominal) an episode never aired. The appeals court believes that Deitz did not point perjury by blueprint and that he had no brain that he was giving a false testimony.Dietz has been in such nationally known kill trials such as Susan Smith, Jeffrey Dahmer, and the ?unabomber? Ted Kaczynski. So the defense believes that... If you want to bleed over a luxuriant essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.