nonpareil of these arguments is that reducing the age will consecrate issues regarding the youth more(prenominal) relevant. If we lower the voting age to 16 their views will be clearer as they will be satisfactory to vote on who represents them as a minority and will put their views crosswise in their favour. When the government makes decisions regarding the youth they need to make genuine that they are in understanding of what younger mickle desire and what they think as. If this does non happen they will not be making the best decision as it will not be representative of the youth and unfair as another(prenominal) people would be making decisions on behalf of them and they are not able to decide on who those people are. It is important they are somewhat a part of making these decisions as it is involving them, for workout education and career is important in this time of their lives and as this is a key topic in election time it will be fair in letting them have some sort of way in having their voices be heard.
another(prenominal) argument for reducing the vote age is that younger people are making important decisions such as in their education, employment and in life, for example people at the age of 16 are able to get married, wherefore they should be able to vote as if they are able to make such choice in their life they should be able to vote on a representative they agree with found on their individual thoughts and understanding. Also there isnt a huge difference between the ages 18 and 16 therefore their knowledge at the age of 16 to 18 does not have a significant difference and they are as capable of making a good decision at the age of 16 compared to 18.
Others may argue that reducing the age would result bad decisions being made as they believe that those at the age of 16 are not educated...If you deprivation to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment